[tur-users] How many real active TUs are there?

[Jeff 'codemac' Mickey]

* On Monday, April 30 2007, Eric Belanger wrote:

>Maybe we should use a common way to display the information; codemac used
>a table while the others used a simple list.  Also, for the AUR
>link, codemac links to his package list while others links to their
>account information.  

I link to my package list because unless you are logged into the aur you 
can't see the page.  Plus, why would you point them to a page with the 
EXACT same information that the previous page had?  A package list is at 
least new information.

>I'm not sure which one is best but we might want to
>choose one and be consistent.  Anyway, it's not a big deal, as long as the
>information is there.

I like my table!  :)  I think it keeps things from getting to long.  I 
don't like having to scroll to see information that could have been 
displayed in a much more compact way.

    //  codemac

PS: No, I'm not quite back and "active" yet after recent events, but I 
should be back soon, I'll announce on tur-users when.

--
.: [ + carpe diem totus tuus + ] :.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://archlinux.org/pipermail/tur-users/attachments/20070430/e8611880/attachment.bin