[tur-users] Ion3

[bardo]

On 4/30/07, Tuomo Valkonen <tuomov at iki.fi> wrote:
> There is (or were) two packages: ion3-darcs, and ion3-darcs-noxft.
> When a user looks at a package listing, he will think of ion3-darcs
> as the standard Ion3 (from the Darcs repository), although it isn't,
> as it has unapproved patches.

Let's suppose you're right. Then, by your affirmations *in this mail*,
we could just switch the package names and have ion3-darcs and
ion3-darcs-xft, but no, you already said that this isn't enough.
You're contradicting yourself, because you just implicitly stated that
switching package names would solve the controversy. Maybe once you
were a programmer, now you're just a troll. I'm in for removing all
ion3-related packages from arch.


bardo